Comments on: 10 Nice things about Bayes’ theorem
https://letterstonature.wordpress.com/2013/10/26/10-nice-things-about-bayes-theorem/
Sun, 30 Jun 2019 05:08:13 +0000
hourly
1 http://wordpress.com/
By: When a Fact becomes Evidence | Letters to Nature
https://letterstonature.wordpress.com/2013/10/26/10-nice-things-about-bayes-theorem/#comment-10205
Sun, 30 Jun 2019 05:08:13 +0000http://letterstonature.wordpress.com/?p=2218#comment-10205[…] 10 Nice things about Bayes’ theorem […]
]]>
By: Des preuves extraordinaires – Défense du théisme
https://letterstonature.wordpress.com/2013/10/26/10-nice-things-about-bayes-theorem/#comment-7924
Wed, 30 Aug 2017 10:40:09 +0000http://letterstonature.wordpress.com/?p=2218#comment-7924[…] minimales, je vous renvoie donc ceux qui n’ont pas une curiosité mathématique poussée vers un article du chercheur postdoctorat Luke Barnes qui explique très bien pour un public non […]
]]>
By: Comment on “Science Increasingly Makes the Case for God” | Letters to Nature
https://letterstonature.wordpress.com/2013/10/26/10-nice-things-about-bayes-theorem/#comment-5208
Fri, 02 Jan 2015 10:16:52 +0000http://letterstonature.wordpress.com/?p=2218#comment-5208[…] likelihood punish a theory sufficiently that an alternative theory should be preferred? Go use Bayes’s Theorem! This part of Metaxas argument is actually valid – if the premises are true, an interesting […]
]]>
By: Carroll’s five replies to the fine-tuning argument: 1a. Aside on Naturalism | Letters to Nature
https://letterstonature.wordpress.com/2013/10/26/10-nice-things-about-bayes-theorem/#comment-4935
Wed, 22 Oct 2014 12:24:57 +0000http://letterstonature.wordpress.com/?p=2218#comment-4935[…] I’ve noted before, a small likelihood represents an opportunity. We rank hypotheses by their likelihood (probability […]
]]>
By: We are all made of stats | Truth, Beauty and a Picture of You
https://letterstonature.wordpress.com/2013/10/26/10-nice-things-about-bayes-theorem/#comment-4682
Sun, 31 Aug 2014 23:43:41 +0000http://letterstonature.wordpress.com/?p=2218#comment-4682[…] responses to experiences are very similar to Bayesian reasoning. Take trust as an example. If some dudette off the street – let’s call her […]
]]>
By: The Carrier-Barnes Exchange on Fine-Tuning
https://letterstonature.wordpress.com/2013/10/26/10-nice-things-about-bayes-theorem/#comment-4255
Fri, 09 May 2014 05:45:54 +0000http://letterstonature.wordpress.com/?p=2218#comment-4255[…] Bayes’ theorem follows from Cox’s theorem, which assumes only some reasonable desiderata of reasoning. […]
]]>
By: Carroll vs. Craig (3): On Contingency | Letters to Nature
https://letterstonature.wordpress.com/2013/10/26/10-nice-things-about-bayes-theorem/#comment-3856
Thu, 06 Feb 2014 23:12:34 +0000http://letterstonature.wordpress.com/?p=2218#comment-3856[…] being handed posteriors from the clouds, we use probability identities to break them into manageable pieces. One of those pieces is the likelihood – the probability […]
]]>
By: Questions for Richard Carrier | Letters to Nature
https://letterstonature.wordpress.com/2013/10/26/10-nice-things-about-bayes-theorem/#comment-3783
Wed, 22 Jan 2014 00:20:33 +0000http://letterstonature.wordpress.com/?p=2218#comment-3783[…] 3 is yes. Bayes’ theorem follows from Cox’s theorem, which assumes only some reasonable desiderata of reasoning. So it is an identity – given any propositions x, y, and z, I can use Equation (4). This is […]
]]>
By: Probably Not – A Fine-Tuned Critique of Richard Carrier (Part 1) | Letters to Nature
https://letterstonature.wordpress.com/2013/10/26/10-nice-things-about-bayes-theorem/#comment-3663
Fri, 13 Dec 2013 04:19:38 +0000http://letterstonature.wordpress.com/?p=2218#comment-3663[…] of fine-tuning. The mathematical background and notation of probability theory were given in a previous post, and follow the discussion of Jaynes. (Note: probabilities can be either or , and both an overbar […]
]]>
By: Bayes’ Theorem: Ad Hoc-ness and Other Details | Letters to Nature
https://letterstonature.wordpress.com/2013/10/26/10-nice-things-about-bayes-theorem/#comment-3656
Wed, 11 Dec 2013 05:41:38 +0000http://letterstonature.wordpress.com/?p=2218#comment-3656[…] about Bayes’ theorem; an introduction was given here. Once again, I’m not claiming any […]
]]>